🌌 Can EMF Effects on Human Cells Be Reversed? A Breakthrough Study Says Yes
/By Dr. Mazvita Maziveyi
"This is a groundbreaking, one-of-a-kind study conducted by EMF Solutions—unlike anything any other company has produced."
We live in a world surrounded by wireless signals: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cell towers. While these technologies keep us connected, there's growing concern that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) may quietly be affecting our health at the cellular level. For the first time in history, a peer-reviewed study offers a glimpse of not only the biological impact of EMFs – but a scientifically validated solution.
📈 What Was Studied?
Dr. Mazvita Maziveyi's groundbreaking research focused on how EMFs affect calcium signaling in human cells, and whether remediation devices can reverse those effects.
EMFs, especially from common sources like Cell phone towers and 6000+ Low orbiting 5g Satellites are known to disrupt calcium balance inside cells. Add on to that all or microwave emitting devices on and in our house like smart meters, cell phones, wifi routers
Calcium is essential for many functions: nerve signaling, hormone release, and cellular repair.
The study used four human cell types: skin (BJ), breast (MCF10A), liver (THLE-2), and colon (HCEC).
🔌 EMFs and Calcium Chaos
EMFs were shown to disturb normal calcium levels in skin and breast cells by affecting voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). This disruption can lead to oxidative stress and cellular damage.
Skin cells: Calcium levels rose dramatically with EMF exposure.
Breast cells: Calcium levels dropped under EMF exposure.
Liver and colon cells: No significant change, suggesting cell-type-specific vulnerability.
🚧 The Game-Changer: Remediation Devices
EMF Solutions provided two devices:
Device Chip: Attached to the Wi-Fi router power cord.
XL Home Harmonizer Box: Placed near the incubator to neutralize ambient EMFs.
When these were applied:
Skin and breast cells returned to near-normal calcium levels.
Results showed extremely high statistical significance (p < 0.0001) – meaning it really works!
🔬 How It Works (Simplified)
According to EMF Solutions:
EMFs may cause "subatomic chaos" by disrupting particle-level balance, especially through metal surfaces.
These devices don't block EMFs but restore harmony at a quantum/subatomic level, preventing damage to VGCCs and restoring normal cellular function.
🪜 Why This Matters
This is the first study showing a successful method to reverse EMF effects in human cells.
Highlights the importance of cell type in EMF sensitivity.
Opens the door to non-invasive, home-based ways to protect cellular health.
🔖 Final Thoughts
As our world becomes increasingly wireless, it's encouraging to see science rising to meet the challenge. Dr. Maziveyi's study suggests that EMF exposure isn't just a threat – it's a solvable problem.
If you're EMF-sensitive or simply proactive about your health, remediation technologies like those tested here may offer powerful protection for your clls.
📖 References
Belpomme, D., Irigaray, P., Hardell, L., Clary, J., Belyaev, I., & Lebar, P. (2018). Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environmental Pollution, 242, 643–658.
BioInitiative Working Group. (2012). BioInitiative Report: A rationale for a biologically-based public exposure standard for electromagnetic fields (ELF and RF).
Berridge, M. J. (2012). Calcium signalling remodelling and disease. Biochemical Society Transactions, 40(2), 297–309.
de Vocht, F. (2017). Commentary: The illusion of evidence—Are EMF symptoms real? Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 27(4), 403–404. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2017.3
Dieudonné, M. (2016). Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo responses? Indications from a qualitative study. Bioelectromagnetics, 37(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21937
Eltiti, S., Wallace, D., Zougkou, K., Russo, R., Joseph, S., Rasor, P., … Fox, E. (2018). Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo responses? Evidence from a provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics, 39(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22117
EPA. (2024). Non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/radtown
Foster, K. R., & Rubin, G. J. (2014). Can exposure to EMF cause symptoms? EMF Health Journal, 13(4), 123–131.
IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO.
NIEHS. (2020). Electric and magnetic fields. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/index.cfm
Pall, M. L. (2013). Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 17(8), 958–965.
Pall, M. L. (2015). Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 75, 43–51.
Schmidt, B., Brugger, P., & Landolt, H. P. (2019). Nocebo effects after watching TV reports about electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 118, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.01.007
WHO. (2022). Radiation: Electromagnetic fields. World Health Organization.
Yakymenko, I., Tsybulin, O., Sidorik, E., Henshel, D., Kyrylenko, S., & Kyrylenko, O. (2016). Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 35(2), 186–202.