EMF Solutions

Having been a chiropractor and functional health specialist since 1993, the use of convenient technology, namely wireless devices, has become increasingly necessary. I enjoy the convenience of wireless technology, but the realization that my daughter was EMF sensitive caused a major shift in my priorities and left me with a problem that seemed impossible to solve. She was miserable around EMFs. After trying thousands of dollars worth of products, EMF Solutions is a God send! They are the only ones that have worked for my daughter and the only ones with the research to prove their effectiveness. -Dr. Paul, Certified EMF Solutions Practitioner

The Bottom Line on Research

• Interesting Fact: AI answers are dependent on asking it the right questions.

  • First Chatgpt question: “Compare the number of studies that EMF’S may be negative vs the number of studies that its not negative for us”

    • Chatgpt answer: “The evidence does not divide evenly. For ordinary radiofrequency exposure within current limits, the human research leans strongly toward no detectable harm, while possible adverse signals appear more frequently in animal and cell studies that often use higher exposures or have methodological limitations.”

  • Follow up question: “What about the studies from military and from BioInitiative Group → www.BioInitiative.org/conclusions - (best place to start - summaries of over 4K of studies) o Powerwatch → https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/docs/aboutus.asp (like BioInitiative...been around for many years) o EMF Alliance → http://www.iemfa.org/ (Independent group of scientists & many studies, etc) o EMF Scientist Group → https://www.emfscientist.org/ (they refer to 1000’s of studies on the Science & Policy tab) o EMF Safety → https://www.saferemr.com/ “

    • Chatgpt answer: “You’re right to challenge my earlier comparison. “185 studies showing no harm versus zero showing harm” was too simplistic. The BioInitiative and military literature contain many real positive findings, particularly biological effects in animals and cells. The disagreement is mainly over what those findings prove about everyday human exposure.” (See Table below)

More interesting facts:

• In Spite of EMF scientists urging the W.H.O to reclassify EMF’s from Class 2B Possible Carcinogen to Class 2A Probable Carcinogen, like Smoking is, if you follow the money, this will take many years, if ever!

• I don’t care what research there is, my preponderance of evidence is clinical efficacy in my daughter! Studies, however, is a bonus to support clinical experience

Are you willing to take the risk and see if they classify it as a Class 2A Carcinogen?

The Research

For years, scientists have understood that ionizing radiation—like X-rays and nuclear power—can damage cells and DNA. But what about non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from everyday sources like Wi-Fi, cell phones, and power lines? These forms of radiation don’t carry enough energy to break DNA directly, and until 2013, their effects on human biology were largely a mystery.

Then came a breakthrough.

A Hidden Mechanism: VGCCs and Cellular Disruption

In 2013, researchers uncovered that Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels (VGCCs)—tiny structures in our cells that regulate calcium flow—are highly sensitive to EMFs. When exposed to EMFs, these channels malfunction, leading to:

• Calcium overload inside cells

• Cellular depolarization (excess positive (+) charges)

• Oxidative stress and free radical damage

• Nitric oxide imbalance (Critical for Blood Vessel Health/heart health)

• DNA damage

Discovering The Solution: Dr. Mazivita Maziveyi (Dr. Vita)

In 2021, Dr. Mazivita Maziveyi, a human-cell and cancer biologist with 18+ peer-reviewed publications and 1,000+ citations, conducted a third-party, independently run cellular study to determine whether EMF-induced biological changes could be normalized.

🔗 Dr. Maziveyi’s Research Profile (ResearchGate)
🔗 NCBI Publications by Dr. Maziveyi

Although EMF Solutions funded the research, the study is classified as independent because:

• The researcher maintained full control over all methodology, data collection, and analysis.

• No influence, steering, or requested outcomes were imposed.

• The investigator used her own scientific protocols and standards.

• Compensation was for her professional time—not for results.

This meets the criteria for an independent, third-party investigation, a standard commonly used in biomedical, supplement, and device research.

Study Overview and Findings

Dr. Maziveyi examined how EMF Solutions’ remediation products affected human cells exposed to EMFs, focusing on calcium channel activity (VGCC response)—a primary hallmark of EMF-related cellular stress.

What the study found

• EMFs produced measurable disruptions in VGCC-related calcium expression.

• The remediation products produced a full normalization effect, reversing the EMF-induced cellular changes.

• These results showed the highest possible statistical significance across two separate studies involving thousands of cells.

• According to the data, this degree of cellular correction had never been previously documented.

Conclusion

The independent analysis demonstrated that the products restored cellular behavior back to normal, effectively reversing EMF-associated biological stress markers.

Root cause identified—and corrected.

Disclaimer

We are a small company committed to doing our best to evaluate and demonstrate how well our products work. However, every study has limitations based on its design, methodology, and testing conditions, and individual results may vary.

That is why we offer our 2-Month Try-It Policy.

Try the product for up to two months. If you are not satisfied, return it to us and receive 97% of your original credit-card purchase price.

Please note:

• The 3% credit-card processing fee is non-refundable.

• Customers are responsible for return shipping costs.

• Refunds are issued after the returned product is received in accordance with our return policy.

We want you to have the opportunity to try the product for yourself and decide whether it is right for you.

I don’t know of any small company that backs their products like we do!

Additional studies/testing methods
1. Human Cell & Calcium Channel Study: Human Cell & EMF Study
2. Mold Tests: Mold grew much faster around EMFs, and much slower near our products.  See SHORT VIDEO for more info.
3. Muscle Testing: Our Muscle-Testing Practitioners have confirmed that no other company matches our amazing solutions.

(listed below are references we hope will help)

References
1. Pub Med.gov – Study “Magnetic-field-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rat.” By University of Washington’s Dr Henry Lai and Dr Signh study in 1995
2. Seattle PI Article “UW Scientist Henry Lai makes Waves in Cell Phone Industry” by Naomi Ishisaka in January 2011
3. France National Library Press Release April 3, 2008 – Article “France National Library (BNF) is giving up Wi-Fi”
4. ICNIRP (International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) organization – 2011 ICNIRP Sci Review “Mobile Phones, Brain Tumors and the Interphone Study: Where are we now?”
5. Pub-Med.gov Article/Study: “Pineal Melatonin Level disruption in humans due to electromagnetic fields and ICNIRP limits.” In 2013
6. “the results show the significance of disruption of melatonin due to exposure to weak EMFs, which may possibly lead to long-term health effects in humans.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23051584
7. Study in 2001 called the Frequency of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Symptoms Based on Distance to Cell Phone Base Station by La Presse Medicale
8. Source taken from Julie Layton’s article called “How does the body make electricity and how does it use it?” on HowStuffWorks.com.
9. DNA Damage and repair – DNA Damage Response lecture in 2003 by Suman Bhattacharjee does state that Ionizing Radiation (a form of EMF exposure) can cause DNA damage which leads to either DNA Repair, Apoptosis (cell death), or Error Prone Repair (cell goes on working while DNA damage is still there).
10. EON – The Ecological Options Network: Media with a Planetarian Perspective – Video called “Public Exposure: DNA, Democracy and the Wireless Revolution” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJbCa-MZwXM
11. The BioInitiative Report of 2007, 2012, and 2014. www.bioinitative.org Over 4,000 studies and conclusions of the effects of EMF’s.
12. “Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity” written by Nilima Shirodkar, Oct 13, 2015
13. Source: Dr Mercola web site May 28, 2017 article with Dr Sam Milham.
14. Published by European Commission Reflex Studies in 2004 by German professor Franz Adlkofer.
15. Berry Trower’s Video – see link above. Berry Trower was Secret Service Weapons Expert in the British military who used Microwaves as weapons and now warns of grave dangers of EMF’s, especially on kids and more so Grand kids.
16. Source: Swedish Neuroscience Professor at Karolinksa Institute in 2017
17. Speeches and videos and writings by Dr Martin Pall, Washington State University

Other References:
Penn State Study and Article “Scientists End 13 Year Debate Proving Non-Ionizing RF Microwave Effect Causes Cell Phone Radiation DNA Damage” Book “The Field” by Lynn McTaggart – describing the human Biofield from a scientific point of view of many scientific disciplines, different doctors and scientists, and from all around the world.